{
	"type": "rich",
	"version": "1.0",
	"provider_name": "Action Network",
	"provider_url": "https://actionnetwork.org",
	
	"html": "<link href='https://actionnetwork.org/css/style-embed-v3.css' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' /><script src='https://actionnetwork.org/widgets/v6/letter/banning-dolls-in-south-dakota-wont-protect-real-children?format=js&source=widget'></script><div id='can-letter-area-banning-dolls-in-south-dakota-wont-protect-real-children' style='width: 100%'><!-- this div is the target for our HTML insertion --></div>",
	"author_name": "Prostasia Foundation",
	"author_url": "https://actionnetwork.org/groups/prostasia",
	"title": "Banning dolls in South Dakota won’t protect real children",
	"thumbnail_url": "https://can2-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/share_options/facebook_images/000/285/560/original/nosexdolls-southdakota.jpg",
	"description": "Sex dolls bans are “child protection theater”—they do nothing to protect real children from abuse, while providing cover for the insidious expansion of obscenity law. South Dakota’s bill SB-126 would solve a problem that doesn’t exist—there has never been a reported case of sex doll ownership escalating to hands-on child sexual abuse, and the world’s leading experts on pedophilia say that dolls may even help prevent abuse. Prostasia Foundation is raising funds for research to confirm whether this is the case. The South Dakota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers has criticized SB-126 for its overbroad language and for criminalizing a victimless act. Don’t let emotional scare tactics win out over sound science. Write to your South Dakota representative to ask them to abandon this unconstitutional and stigma-driven law, and instead to support real, evidence-based interventions such as comprehensive sex education that have been proved to help prevent real children from being abused.",
	"url": "https://actionnetwork.org/letters/banning-dolls-in-south-dakota-wont-protect-real-children"
}