{
	"type": "rich",
	"version": "1.0",
	"provider_name": "Action Network",
	"provider_url": "https://actionnetwork.org",
	
	"html": "<link href='https://actionnetwork.org/css/style-embed-v3.css' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' /><script src='https://actionnetwork.org/widgets/v6/letter/boundary-waters-mining?format=js&source=widget'></script><div id='can-letter-area-boundary-waters-mining' style='width: 100%'><!-- this div is the target for our HTML insertion --></div>",
	"author_name": "Native Organizers Alliance Action Fund",
	"author_url": "https://actionnetwork.org/groups/native-organizers-alliance",
	"title": "Boundary Waters Mining",
	"thumbnail_url": "https://can2-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/groups/default_facebook_images/000/022/886/original/NOA_ActionFundBanner2.png?1668645803",
	"description": "A mining company wants to mine for copper right next to Minnesota’s protected Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, which stretches about 150 miles along the border of Minnesota and Canada. Even the resolution’s author, Rep. Pete Stauber (R-MN), admits that if the foreign mining corporation is allowed to mine for copper in northern Minnesota, the minerals would be processed overseas -- undermining proponents’ key argument about the need for mining for national security purposes. During Biden’s presidency, the U.S. Forest Service held a public comment period on a moratorium on mining close to the Boundary Waters. Of the more than 675,000 comments, 95% were in favor of banning mining and protecting the natural habitat. This resulted in the Biden administration creating a 20 year moratorium on mining in the area. This resolution flies in the face of what the majority of people want. But it’s already passed the U.S. House and is expected to get a vote in the Senate very soon. Click “Start Writing” to send a message to your Senators demanding they reject this resolution, which would destroy northern Minnesota’s interconnected freshwater habitats.",
	"url": "https://actionnetwork.org/letters/boundary-waters-mining"
}