{
	"type": "rich",
	"version": "1.0",
	"provider_name": "Action Network",
	"provider_url": "https://actionnetwork.org",
	
	"html": "<link href='https://actionnetwork.org/css/style-embed-v3.css' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' /><script src='https://actionnetwork.org/widgets/v6/letter/no-burdensome-adu-restrictions-in-berkeley?format=js&source=widget'></script><div id='can-letter-area-no-burdensome-adu-restrictions-in-berkeley' style='width: 100%'><!-- this div is the target for our HTML insertion --></div>",
	"author_name": "East Bay YIMBY",
	"author_url": "https://actionnetwork.org/groups/yimbyeastbay",
	"title": "No burdensome ADU restrictions in Berkeley",
	"thumbnail_url": "https://actionnetwork.org//images/generic_facebook.jpg",
	"description": "More ADU restrictions have been proposed for the Berkeley hills, including an off-street parking requirement – which may even violate state law! The proposal will be heard at Berkeley City Council tomorrow as item #17 on the agenda, which is the first item on the action calendar. Sorry for the lack of warning, but we need to speak up against these anti-housing changes! One might ask, Are any of these changes about fire safety? Well, if the Berkeley hills truly faced such a fire risk, why is it still legal to build new single-family homes there or to expand existing residences? Thankfully, Councilmember Rashi Kesarwani has put forward a supplemental that will fix the issues in the original proposal. Let&#x27;s let city council know that we want Rashi&#x27;s pro-housing supplemental, not the original, restrictive proposal.",
	"url": "https://actionnetwork.org/letters/no-burdensome-adu-restrictions-in-berkeley"
}