<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<type>rich</type>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<provider_name>Action Network</provider_name>
	<provider_url>https://actionnetwork.org</provider_url>
	
	<html>&amp;lt;link href=&amp;#39;https://actionnetwork.org/css/style-embed-v3.css&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;stylesheet&amp;#39; type=&amp;#39;text/css&amp;#39; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;script src=&amp;#39;https://actionnetwork.org/widgets/v6/form/have-your-say-our-ruling-docs?format=js&amp;amp;source=widget&amp;#39;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div id=&amp;#39;can-form-area-have-your-say-our-ruling-docs&amp;#39; style=&amp;#39;width: 100%&amp;#39;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- this div is the target for our HTML insertion --&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;</html>
	<author_name>LGBTIQA+ Greens</author_name>
	<author_url>https://actionnetwork.org/groups/lgbtiqa-greens</author_url>
	<title>Have Your Say- Our Ruling Docs!</title>
	<thumbnail_url>https://actionnetwork.org//images/generic_facebook.jpg</thumbnail_url>
	<description>Over the past few months we&#x27;ve been holding regular meetings, open to members to help us review our ruling documents and bring a new fit-for-purpose constitution to our AGM. The ruling documents that we&#x27;ve been reviewing are: The LGBTIQA+ Greens Constitution Our Code of Conduct Management Group Terms of Reference Our Elections Regulations As we approach our AGM we&#x27;d like to get the input of more of our members on some of the main changes to our ruling documents, in particular our constitution. This isn&#x27;t a vote, just an indication of support for each of the current proposals to support the completion of the current changes. PROPOSAL ONE: Define Membership Current Situation: Membership of the LGBTIQA+ Greens is determined by email subscription status and current membership of the Green Party of England &amp;amp; Wales. This means that we have no idea of the true number of members, and cannot effectively target our comms. This increases the cost of our comms, and internal elections. Proposal: Membership of the LGBTIQA+ Greens will be defined in the constitution, with two levels of membership available: Full Member: With Voting Rights Associate Member: With No Voting Rights Additionally, we will define &quot;Supporters&quot; as any individual who is not a member of GPEW, but is subscribed to email updates from the LGBTIQA+ Greens. Supporters will have no voting rights. PROPOSAL TWO: Changes to the Committee Current Situation: The current LGBTIQA+ Greens committee is made up of two independently elected co-chairs, a treasurer, a secretary, and five members&#x27; representatives, without portfolio. Proposal: We propose removing the positions of members&#x27; representatives and creating roles with portfolio. These roles may change, but to give you an idea of how the committee could look here are the current proposed roles: Two independently-elected co-chairs. Treasurer Secretary Liberation Officer Digital Comms Officer External Comms/Press Officer Membership Officer Elections Officer Policy Officer Campaigns Officer International Officer PROPOSAL THREE: Limit Co-Options Current Situation: Should a vacancy arise on the LGBTIQA+ Greens committee, remaining members of the committee may co-opt somebody into this role. Proposal: As repeat co-options during a committee term can result in a committee far-removed from that voted on by members we propose limiting the number of co-options that can take place during a committee term. This would mean that once that co-option limit had been reached any further vacancies would need to go to a full-member vote. PROPOSAL FOUR: Define Quoracy &amp;amp; Votes for Job Shares Current Situation: At present it is not defined if committee votes are per-person, or per role. For example, should the Treasurer position be held by two people as part of a job share it is not clear if each post-holder can vote, or if one vote is available per position. Proposal: We believe it&#x27;s important to define this within our constitution to reflect the hope that the committee will grow. We propose defining the number of votes allocated to a job-shared position, and similarly defining quoracy of committee meetings to clarify if quoracy is based on individuals present, or roles represented. PROPOSAL FIVE: Regional representation Current Situation: We have loosely organised regional sub-groups of the LGBTIQA+ Greens. None have submitted a constitution to the LGBTIQA+ Greens. Proposal: We hope that as these regional groups grow they will adopt consitutions and be recognised by the LGBTIQA+ Greens. We propose that a representative for each of these regional groups be given a place on the LGBTIQA+ Greens committee to ensure regions are adequately represented. Our current proposal does not make clear if these regional representatives will be voting or non-voting members of the LGBTIQA+ Greens committee. It may be that they are non-voting, until all regions are represented. PROPOSAL SIX: Define Number of Nominations Required Current Situation: At present the number of nominations required for each committee position is equal. Proposal: We propose defining the number of nominations required for each committee role, potentially with a higher threshold of valid nominations needed for some positions. For example: Co-Chair: Five Treasurer: Five All Other ROLES: Two The above is an example only, and may not be representative of the number of required votes. What Next? Members of the LGBTIQA+ Greens will be able to vote on the changes to our ruling documents at our AGM on November 19th 2022. If you&#x27;d like to get involved with the LGBTIQA+ Greens, have any questions, or are considering standing for a committee position please give us a shout on info@lgbtiqa.greenparty.org.uk, or keep an eye on your inbox for opportunities to get involved.</description>
	<url>https://actionnetwork.org/forms/have-your-say-our-ruling-docs</url>
</oembed>