<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<type>rich</type>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<provider_name>Action Network</provider_name>
	<provider_url>https://actionnetwork.org</provider_url>
	
	<html>&amp;lt;link href=&amp;#39;https://actionnetwork.org/css/style-embed-v3.css&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;stylesheet&amp;#39; type=&amp;#39;text/css&amp;#39; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;script src=&amp;#39;https://actionnetwork.org/widgets/v6/letter/safeguarding-coast-guard-veterans-disability-ratings?format=js&amp;amp;source=widget&amp;#39;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div id=&amp;#39;can-letter-area-safeguarding-coast-guard-veterans-disability-ratings&amp;#39; style=&amp;#39;width: 100%&amp;#39;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- this div is the target for our HTML insertion --&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;</html>
	<author_name>US Coast Guard Chief Warrant &amp; Warrant Officers Association</author_name>
	<author_url>https://actionnetwork.org/groups/cwoauscg</author_url>
	<title>Safeguarding Coast Guard Veterans’ Disability Ratings</title>
	<thumbnail_url>https://can2-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/share_options/facebook_images/000/625/409/original/cwoa_va_rule_change.jpg</thumbnail_url>
	<description>We’re hearing the VA may withdraw the recent rule change to 38 CFR §4.10. If that happens, it’s because veterans spoke up. That’s good news — but it’s not enough. This rule raised serious concerns that managing a service-connected condition with medication or treatment could be viewed as “improvement” when evaluating disability ratings. For Coast Guard veterans, following a doctor’s orders should never put earned benefits at risk. Even if the rule is pulled, we need Congress to ensure this approach does not return under another name. Take a minute to send a letter. Ask for oversight. Protect earned benefits. The Coast Guard may be small, but when we stand together, we are powerful.</description>
	<url>https://actionnetwork.org/letters/safeguarding-coast-guard-veterans-disability-ratings</url>
</oembed>