<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<oembed>
	<type>rich</type>
	<version>1.0</version>
	<provider_name>Action Network</provider_name>
	<provider_url>https://actionnetwork.org</provider_url>
	
	<html>&amp;lt;link href=&amp;#39;https://actionnetwork.org/css/style-embed-v3.css&amp;#39; rel=&amp;#39;stylesheet&amp;#39; type=&amp;#39;text/css&amp;#39; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;script src=&amp;#39;https://actionnetwork.org/widgets/v6/petition/submit-a-public-comment-no-keystone-light-pipeline?format=js&amp;amp;source=widget&amp;#39;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div id=&amp;#39;can-petition-area-submit-a-public-comment-no-keystone-light-pipeline&amp;#39; style=&amp;#39;width: 100%&amp;#39;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- this div is the target for our HTML insertion --&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;</html>
	<author_name>Bold Nebraska</author_name>
	<author_url>https://actionnetwork.org/groups/bold-nebraska</author_url>
	<title>Submit a Public Comment: NO &quot;Keystone Light&quot; Bridger Pipeline Expansion Project</title>
	<thumbnail_url>https://can2-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/share_options/facebook_images/000/642/193/original/Screenshot_2026-04-08_at_11.40.13_AM.jpg</thumbnail_url>
	<description>Some are calling it &quot;Keystone Light,&quot; but don’t let this name fool you – the new Bridger Pipeline Expansion Project could pump just as much tarsands oil as the once-proposed Keystone XL pipeline, and would pose the same threats to the land, tribal sovereignty, property rights and the Ogallala aquifer as before. Submit a written comment to make sure your voice is heard.</description>
	<url>https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/submit-a-public-comment-no-keystone-light-pipeline</url>
</oembed>