Demand a SAAFE Campus!

President Bollinger, Suzanne Goldberg, Jeri Henry, and Melissa Rooker

Despite the recent update to the Gender-Based Misconduct Policy and the new Sexual Respect Initiative, survivors of sexual and dating violence on on Columbia University's campus continue to feel unsafe, retraumatized by a poorly run disciplinary process, and failed by the administrators that are supposed to support them. Join No Red Tape in calling for a SAAFE community for all students.

Sponsored by
Washington, DC

To: President Bollinger, Suzanne Goldberg, Jeri Henry, and Melissa Rooker
From: [Your Name]

Despite the recent update to the Gender-Based Misconduct Policy and the new Sexual Respect Initiative, survivors on this campus continue to feel unsafe, retraumatized by a poorly run disciplinary process, and failed by the administrators that are supposed to support them. To ensure this is an inclusive educational environment and everyone can thrive, regardless of identity (including but not limited to race, sex, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, immigration status, and religion), we demand the following changes:

1) Increase culturally responsive mental health services and trauma response staff by requiring the Safe Space Training offered by the Office of Multicultural Affairs and trainings addressing other issues of including, but not limited to, race and class.
2) Have professional staffing at a Rape Crisis Center on campus 24/7.
3)Allow students to have both moral and legal support throughout the reporting and adjudication process. Students should not have to choose between having a loved one or lawyer by their side.
4) Remove the exception for GBM that requires the Office of Disability Services, Health Services, and all other normally confidential services to report cases of GBM. Survivors should be able to request accommodations without triggering an investigation.
5) Educate all first-responders to be culturally sensitive and aware of resources on campus, including immediate support to feel safe navigating campus, STI testing and reporting options.

1) Revise the policy language to remove unnecessarily complex and inaccessible legal jargon. The policy’s language should be clear and easily understood by any student.
2) Provide students, especially those who cannot afford an attorney advisor, with more options for legal representation, such as alumni, members of the campus legal community or other volunteer attorneys.
3) Make aggregate data about processes available to all students, including instances of repeat offenders and specific information about accommodations granted.
4) Revise policy language to clarify procedures for requesting academic and other interim and post accommodations and grant students more agency over academic and other accommodations by:
5) Removing the Student Conduct and Community Standards Office from the decision-making process around academic accommodations, such as exam extensions and course withdrawals.
6) Allowing for increased coordination between the Office of Gender-Based Misconduct, Disability Services and the various CU schools to increase access to accommodations for student survivors. Academic accommodations should be handled by same university offices that handle these issues in other, non-sexual misconduct contexts.

1) Allow a wide variety of students to be consistently involved in the revision and oversight of campus policies and programs.
2) Revise Clery Crime Alert protocols to include information about on-going threats posed by university-affiliated individuals. Additionally, revise language of the alerts to include trigger warnings and replace victim blaming “tips” with resources for survivors.
3) Explicitly recognize students’ right to record all interviews and meetings with Student Conduct and Community Standards staff to ensure the accuracy of all parties’ accounts and the legitimacy of the overall process.
4) Increase transparency around employee training and qualifications, especially for legally mandated reporters, GBM investigators, and hearing panelists.
5) Establish a feedback mechanism that allows students to share their experiences with Columbia’s prevention programs, resources and adjudication processes. This survey should be widely publicized and received by an independent body that does not control any of the previously mentioned programs, potentially composed of faculty, to avoid further conflict of interest.

1) Increase the number of investigators and case managers to ensure appropriate responses to conflicts of interest requests. For example, a student should never be reassigned to his or her alleged assailant’s case manager after submitting a conflict of interest request.
2) Make the SVR peer advocate and peer educator jobs paid positions of at least $15/hour to reflect their value in our community and increase accessibility for low-income students.
3) Fund mental and physical health services so survivors don’t have to face weeks of wait times.
4) Institute and publicize regular support groups for survivors of varying kinds of violence.

1) Clarify enforcement mechanisms to ensure the policy works as written.
2) Remove conflict of interest from adjudication by appointing objective administrators or faculty.
3) Include a process for the investigation and removal of investigators, case managers and other employees, who fail to adequately and appropriately carry out their duties on behalf of survivors.
4) Create and require more robust prevention programs with professional oversight to ensure all students participate in a meaningful way.
5) Allow students to file an anonymous report so it can be counted in Clery Crime Statistics without initiating an investigation process.

No Red Tape is an activist group fighting to end rape culture at Columbia University.