Redistricting Testimony for D26: LIC, Sunnyside, Dutch Kills and Woodside must stay together

Our community's proposed map for District 26:

Dear NYC Districting Commission:

District 26 is our home. We are a diverse community where people of color and immigrants make up the majority — according to the 2020 census, 66% of the respondents of District 26 identified as Latin American, Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI), and Black — the very communities of interest protected by the Voting Rights Act. District 26 is currently the home to Little Manila for our Filipino neighbors, Little Bangladesh for our Bangladeshi neighbors, Tibet Way for our Tibetan Neighbors, and is currently assembling a little Taiwan in Long Island City.

Our local YMCA has the only Japanese Immersion program in NYC for our Japanese neighbors in Sunnyside and Long Island City. When you walk down Skillman Avenue in Sunnyside, you’ll see Korean letters on the awnings of Korean hair salons, laundromats, and restaurants. On Queens Blvd, Northern Blvd, and Roosevelt Ave of Sunnyside and Woodside there are multiple Korean Churches where Korean Americans gather to worship. It is no surprise that we elected our first immigrant and Asian American council member to this district, reflecting the 33% growth of the AAPI population in the latest census. The preliminary map of District 26 from the redistricting commission would divide Woodside into four council districts fracturing the AAPI community of District 26 from where they reside, worship, work, and gather. The fracturing in representation would negatively impact the AAPI community’s ability to effectuate public policy for public interest.

In addition to the AAPI community, District 26 is also the home to the Colombian community, Ecuadorian community, Peruvian community, Mexican community, and so many other Latin American immigrants who make up 29% of our district. From Long Island City, Astoria, Sunnyside, to Woodside, there is not a corner of our district that does not have Spanish-speaking Catholic churches, Mexican taquerias/delis, Colombian bakeries, Peruvian chicken joints, Spanish-speaking arts organizations like Thalia Spanish Theater and Manhatitlan Mexican Folkloric Dance club, and non profits like NICE, which serve our new immigrant neighbors. District 26 is also the home to the Ecuadorian Consulate of NYC. The preliminary map from the redistricting commission would divide Woodside into four council districts fracturing the Latin American communities from where they reside, worship, work, and gather. The fracturing in representation would negatively impact the Latin American community’s ability to effectuate public policy for public interest.

When speaking of people of color that make up our district, we cannot forget the residents of Queensbridge Houses, Ravenswood Houses, and Woodside Houses. Queensbridge Houses, the largest public houses in the country, has been a part of this district since the 1940s. These three NYCHAs have been together in the district for over 20 years and provide consistency and continuation in receiving public resources such as capital investments and benefits. Many of the students from our NYCHAs attend school in District 26 — predominantly in Long Island City — and the current school district is in the midst of a rezoning to integrate our Black and brown schools with predominantly white schools. Cutting them out of the district they traditionally have been a part of will disrupt their education accessibility, capital funding projects, and their ability to receive services when there are two separate council members for their school district.

The proposed map would remove six schools from our district in Community Education Council 24 and Community Education Council 30: PS 111, Voice Charter, PS 76, PS 152, The Woodside Community School, and PS 12.  

To summarize, preliminary maps proposed by the NYC Districting Commission would break up our immigrant communities and Black communities into FOUR different City Council districts, severely limiting their political power. The new district would shift from majority people of color protected by the Voting Rights Act to predominantly white violating the NY City Charter:

  • White population increases from 29% to 44%
  • Hispanic population decreases from 29% to 22%
  • Asian population decreases from 31% to 25%
  • Black population decreases from 6% to 4%
The preliminary map fails to comply with the City Charter’s requirements of fair and effective representation; keeping neighborhoods and communities intact; keeping districts compact; limiting crossover districts; and avoiding oddly shaped districts. In the borough of Queens, we already have two crossover districts — District 22 and District 34. If the preliminary lines were to stay for District 26, we would add a third cross over district to Queens. The preliminary map is also not contiguous; in order for a District 26 resident to travel to Roosevelt Island, they would have to leave District 26 and cross over to District 22 to take the only land bridge to Roosevelt island in the neighboring district.

In addition to the illegal shift of our population from majority people of color to majority white — our average income level would double in the preliminary map from an average of $70-80k to $140-150k. In essence, the redistricting commission has dissolved a working class, predominantly people of color district to create a wealthy, white district, violating the requirement to keep neighborhoods and communities of interests intact as well as the requirement of fair and effective representation of those protected by the VRA.  

As a resident of District 26, I ask that the redistricting commission uses this proposed map:, which reaches our ideal population of ~172k residents by removing outer edges of our district without dividing the communities protected by the Voting Rights Act (Black, Latin American, and Asian). We ask that you keep Woodside whole as part of District 26 so that we don’t fracture the immigrant community’s ability to effectuate public policy for public interest. If divided, our AAPI and Latin American communities will be served by four council members instead of being advocated by one council member with greater community impact. We would also like to highlight that the Tibetan Community, who have been discriminated against in geopolitical issues, must be placed together in District 26 connecting them to Sunnyside, Astoria, Long Island City with Woodside where they reside and organize. The Tibetan community center, which is the home to 15,000 Tibetan Americans, is located in Woodside. We also ask that you allow the NYCHAs to remain in the district as they have been and undivided — Queensbridge, Ravenswood and Woodside Houses together.  

We ask that District 26 remains solely in Queens and the district compactness remains virtually the same as the prior map, instead of the “C” shape in the proposed map. If you were to ask District 26 residents to choose between Woodside and Sunnyside for the district — many will say it would be unconscionable to divide the “sides.” To us, there is no border where Sunnyside ends and Woodside begins because we are one loving community. NYC Districting Commission, we urge you to allow us to remain intact as one community as we have been for generations to adhere to the NYC charter guidelines for redistricting. Thank you.

Testifying in person/virtually:

To register to testify in person at the Museum of the Moving Image on August 16th from 5:30-9:00 pm, visit:

There is also an option to testify virtually via Zoom.

Testifying by email:

Those who can’t make it to the Museum of the Moving Image to give an in-person testimony can send an email testimony to  

Letter Campaign by
N/A, New York