Tell Congress we want a strong chemicals law

US Senate and House of Representatives

puzzle punctuation

The US Senate passed TSCA Reform. What's Next?

Last year, the US Congress passed bills to reform the Toxic Substances Control Act. The House passed its chemical safety bill in June 2015, and the Senate passed its bill at the end of the year. Now, the two pieces of legislation must be combined in order for the final version to go to President Obama for his signature.

Tell Congress we need reform that goes forward, not backward. Send this message to Congress:


During this final phase of the legislative process, I urge you to combine the best of the House and Senate reform bills and leave special-interest loopholes on the cutting room floor.

A good final bill would combine the more streamlined approach of the House proposal with the resources and mandate of the Senate proposal. It should:
• Remove the legal barriers that currently prevent EPA from testing, reviewing, and – when necessary  restricting a chemical to ensure safety.
• Expedite EPA action on persistent and bio-accumulative chemicals (“PBTs”).
• Preserve the ability of states to protect their residents.
• End the abuse of provisions for confidential business information.
• Require EPA to make steady progress every year.
• Ensure EPA has the resources it needs.
• Not weaken any current EPA authority (such as regulation of imported products)
The decade-long chemical reform effort is in the home stretch. Reform will be a significant achievement for public health if it focuses on these fundamentals.

 

Here's more detail on the issue:

Both bills contain fundamental reforms that empower EPA to test chemicals and to restrict them when needed to protect public health and the environment.

Unfortunately, there are also provisions, especially in the Senate bill, that exist solely to help out special interests. For example, the Senate bill makes it harder for EPA to restrict chemicals in imported products. It would let some chemicals off the hook without a thorough safety review and it would block states from taking action on chemicals while EPA is reviewing their safety, which could take years. The House bill largely avoids those problems but it fails to provide EPA with new resources and a mandatory schedule.

Tell Congress to make the final bill as strong as possible.

The final bill should combine the best of both bills, rather than the worst. It should ensure that EPA makes steady progress every year. It should have no loopholes or rollbacks and it should preserve the ability of state governments to protect their residents.

Sponsored by
Chnybanner1500px
Albany, NY

To: US Senate and House of Representatives
From: [Your Name]

During this final phase of the legislative process, I urge you to combine the best of the House and Senate reform bills and leave special-interest loopholes on the cutting room floor.

A good final bill would combine the more streamlined approach of the House proposal with the resources and mandate of the Senate proposal. It should:
• Remove the legal barriers that currently prevent EPA from testing, reviewing, and – when necessary- restricting a chemical to ensure safety.
• Expedite EPA action on persistent and bio-accumulative chemicals (“PBTs”).
• Preserve the ability of states to protect their residents.
• End the abuse of provisions for confidential business information.
• Require EPA to make steady progress every year.
• Ensure EPA has the resources it needs.
• Not weaken any current EPA authority (such as regulation of imported products)

The decade-long chemical reform effort is in the home stretch. Reform will be a significant achievement for public health if it focuses on these fundamentals.