Fight the Execution of an Innocent Man
Texas Authorities
Charles Don Flores’s wrongful conviction is a result of an identification made long after the crime by a witness who had repeatedly failed to identify Mr. Flores and described seeing two perpetrators who looked nothing like him. Her identification of Charles was made for the first time mid-trial, after she had been subjected to “investigative hypnosis” and after she had been exposed, on multiple occasions, to Mr. Flores’s photo.
The fruits of investigative hypnosis are now banned from Texas criminal trials because it is junk science. But Charles has remained on death row for over 26 years and is at serious risk of execution because no court has yet considered the evidence of his innocence.
Please visit www.freecharlesflores.com for more information. Thank you for your support!
Sponsored by
To:
Texas Authorities
From:
[Your Name]
Texas, we are watching.
For over 26 years, Charles Don Flores has remained in solitary confinement, at risk of execution for a crime he did not commit. Convicted using a hypnotized witness, Charles' case is outrageous, especially as Texas lawmakers now recognize that “investigative hypnosis” is so unreliable the fruits of it cannot be used in criminal trials.
Charles’s wrongful conviction is a result of an identification made long after the crime by a witness who had repeatedly failed to identify Charles and described seeing two perpetrators who looked nothing like him. Her identification of Charles was made for the first time mid-trial, after she had been subjected to “investigative hypnosis” and after she had been exposed, on multiple occasions, to Charles' photo.
No court has ever considered the large body of suppressed evidence exposing that the State’s entire case was saved, mid-trial, by the hypnotized witness. And The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has refused to consider the incompatibility of a conviction and death sentence dependent on the junk science of “investigative hypnosis,” even as current Texas law bans reliance on testimony obtained from that form of witness-tampering.
With 71 documented exonerations, Dallas County is among the top seven counties with the most exonerations - and thus the most wrongful convictions. We urge all Texas authorities to authorize or demand a new trial untainted by unreliable testimony from a hypnotized witness.
Do not kill this innocent man.