Extend the Public Comment Period on Expanded Plutonium Pit Production Until Critical Documents Are Released
Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration
The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is asking the public to comment on its Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for expanded plutonium pit production—a proposal that would shape U.S. nuclear weapons production for decades.
The Draft PEIS would guide plutonium pit production through at least 2075, with significant implications for surrounding communities, Tribal Nations, workers, environmental resources, public health, and federal spending. A decision of this magnitude deserves a review process that is transparent, scientifically complete, and fully informed.
Three nonprofit organizations—Savannah River Site Watch, Tri-Valley CAREs, and Nuclear Watch New Mexico—represented by the South Carolina Environmental Law Project, have requested that NNSA publicly release three critical documents that they argue are directly relevant to the Draft PEIS and the public's ability to provide informed comments.
These documents include:
- A new independent JASON study evaluating the expected lifespan of plutonium pits.
- A Department of Energy Special Study examining leadership and management of the plutonium pit production program.
- An updated Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for Los Alamos National Laboratory, which the Draft PEIS anticipated would be completed.
Without access to these documents, the public cannot fully evaluate key assumptions regarding the need for expanded plutonium pit production, project management, facility safety, and environmental risks.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) exists to ensure informed decision-making through transparency and meaningful public participation. That process depends on the public having access to relevant information before comment periods close.
We therefore urge the National Nuclear Security Administration to:
- Release the unclassified versions or summaries of the three requested documents as soon as possible.
- Extend the public comment period for the Draft Pit Production Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement by at least 30 days after these documents are publicly released.
- Ensure that the final PEIS fully considers and responds to the information contained in these documents before making any final decisions.
This request is not about delaying public participation—it is about making public participation meaningful.
The decisions made through this PEIS could influence nuclear weapons production, environmental protection, worker safety, community health, Tribal cultural resources, and taxpayer investments for decades. Americans deserve a transparent process based on the best available information.
Please sign this petition to support government transparency, informed public participation, and a fair environmental review process.
To:
Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration
From:
[Your Name]
I urge the National Nuclear Security Administration to extend the public comment period for the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) on Plutonium Pit Production until the public has access to critical information necessary for meaningful review.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires informed public participation. That participation cannot be meaningful if key documents directly relevant to the Draft PEIS are unavailable during the public comment period.
Before closing the public comment period, NNSA should publicly release:
- The unclassified summary of the updated JASON plutonium pit lifetime study;
- The Department of Energy Special Study on leadership and management of the plutonium pit production program; and
- The updated Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) for Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Once these documents are released, I respectfully request that NNSA extend the public comment period by at least 30 days to allow Tribal Nations, affected communities, scientists, public health experts, local governments, and members of the public adequate time to review this information and provide informed comments.
The decisions made through this PEIS will shape plutonium pit production and the nation's nuclear weapons complex for decades. Such a consequential decision deserves a transparent environmental review based on complete and publicly available information.
I also urge NNSA to ensure that the Final PEIS fully evaluates and responds to the information contained in these documents before issuing any final decisions.
Transparency, scientific integrity, and meaningful public participation are fundamental to NEPA. I respectfully ask NNSA to uphold these principles by releasing the requested documents and extending the public comment period.
Thank you for your consideration.