Oppose the Pacific Link Pipeline and Supertankers to Protect Washington State
Governor Ferguson, Ecology Director Sixkiller, and all Washington State agencies responsible for environmental protections, oil spill prevention and response, wildlife and endangered species, public health, emergency management, and maritime safety
Overview
Forty-nine years ago, the U.S. Congress banned supertankers from Washington state. Now, Canada has proposed a new oil pipeline that would bring supertankers and their increased risks and impacts to Washington State waters in the Salish Sea. Join Friends of the San Juans in asking the state to oppose this new pipeline and supertanker traffic. Please sign the petition by October 19.
What’s at Stake?
The Opportunity
Thank you for speaking up to ensure that Washington state is not left to bear the risks and costs of this Canadian tar sands crude oil export project.
Learn More
- Joint statement from Governor Ferguson and Director Sixkiller
- Information about Canada’s pipeline proposal
- Washington state’s supertanker restriction, RCW 88.16.190
- Congress passed Senator Warren Magnuson's amendment banning supertankers in Washington state waters in the Salish Sea on October 5, 1977
__________________________________
Friends of the San Juans has been advocating for stronger safeguards for the Salish Sea for more than 40 years. Learn more about the full breadth of our work at sanjuans.org. And, be sure you’re signed up for Action Alerts so you’ll be the first to know when new opportunities open for public comment with Friends of the San Juans!
To:
Governor Ferguson, Ecology Director Sixkiller, and all Washington State agencies responsible for environmental protections, oil spill prevention and response, wildlife and endangered species, public health, emergency management, and maritime safety
From:
[Your Name]
As a Washington state resident, I urge you to oppose Canada’s Pacific Link pipeline (formerly the West Coast Oil Pipeline), Roberts Bank crude oil export terminal, and the use of Very Large Crude Carriers, including through all available legal and regulatory actions.
The Pacific Link pipeline would transport one million barrels of tar sands crude oil per day to a terminal just north of the U.S.-Canada border. The terminal would store up to 6.5 million barrels of crude oil and load Very Large Crude Carriers for export. These supertankers are prohibited in Washington State east of Port Angeles (see RCW 88.16.190 and 33 C.F.R. Sec. 165.1303).
Accident and oil spill risk, air and water pollution, underwater noise, and other tanker traffic impacts do not stop at the border. This project could cause severe and lasting impacts to Washington waters, communities, public health, fisheries, Tribal Treaty Rights, endangered species, and the state’s economy.
Washington state should actively participate in all Canadian federal, provincial, port, marine-safety, and energy-regulatory proceedings. The Governor’s Office and state agencies should submit coordinated evidence, seek formal participant or intervenor status where available, take legal actions and preserve all legal options, and require thorough analyses of all transboundary risks and impacts.
If the project proceeds despite Washington state’s opposition, project conditions should include enforceable protections for the state, including:
- Washington state-based accident and oil-spill prevention and response resources, including dedicated emergency response towing capacity;
- equipment and trained personnel positioned to protect the state’s waters and shorelines;
- immediate cross-border notification and access to real-time incident information;
- coordinated spill command, exercises, trajectory modeling, and wildlife response;
- mutually identified measures protecting Southern Resident killer whales, salmon, seabirds, and sensitive shorelines;
- rigorous tanker escort, navigation, operating-condition, and emergency-shutdown requirements;
- continuous and publicly accessible air, water, noise, and vessel-traffic monitoring;
- transparent public reporting and independent oversight;
- enforceable funding and financial assurance covering Washington state’s prevention, preparedness, response, restoration, and compensation costs; and
- authority to strengthen or suspend operations when monitoring identifies unacceptable risks.
Washington state should not accept assurances or conditions that exist only in Canada. Any credible prevention and response system must provide the people, vessels, equipment, funding, and decision-making protocols needed on both sides of the border.
As a Washington resident, I expect the Governor, Ecology and other state agencies to protect our waters and communities before decisions are made, not after an accident occurs. Please oppose the Pacific Link pipeline and supertankers with every available legal and regulatory tool and ensure that Washington state is not left to bear the risks and costs of this Canadian tar sands crude oil export project. Also, please publicly identify the actions the Governor’s Office and state agencies will take to participate in Canadian proceedings, take legal actions, preserve legal options, and secure state-based prevention and response resources.